Llama 3.1 405B: Meta's Open-Source Answer to GPT-4
Llama 3.1 405B achieves 88.6% on MMLU and matches GPT-4 on multiple benchmarks, with a commercial license for up to 700M MAU. Here's how to run it.
Mahmudul Haque Qudrati
CEO & ML Engineer
One AI engineering post, weekly
LLM benchmarks, prompt techniques, and token-cost breakdowns — not another AI news roundup.
When Meta released Llama 3.1 405B, it was the first open-source model to credibly compete with GPT-4 across a broad benchmark suite. With 405 billion parameters and a 128k token context window, it brought frontier-level capability to teams who need full control over their model stack.
MMLU score: 88.6% (vs GPT-4 at 86.4% and GPT-4o at 88.7%). On HumanEval (code generation), it scores 89.0% - on par with proprietary alternatives.
License
The Llama 3.1 Community License allows commercial use for products with up to 700 million monthly active users. That covers virtually every startup and enterprise. Companies above that threshold must negotiate a separate agreement with Meta. Full terms at HuggingFace.
Team workspace
Ship faster with chat, meetings, and projects in one place — Zlyqor.
Hardware Requirements
The full BF16 model requires approximately 810GB of GPU VRAM - that's 8× H100 80GB GPUs. For most teams, running it through an inference provider (Together AI, Fireworks, Groq) is more practical.
Running Quantized Versions Locally
For local experimentation, GGUF quantized versions via llama.cpp dramatically reduce memory requirements:
# Install Ollama
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
# Pull the quantized 405B (Q4_K_M quantization, ~230GB)
ollama pull llama3.1:405b
# Run a prompt
ollama run llama3.1:405b "Explain the attention mechanism in one paragraph."
For the smaller variants that run on consumer hardware:
# 70B - runs on 2× 3090s or A100 40GB
ollama pull llama3.1:70b
# 8B - runs on a single 3090 or M2 MacBook Pro
ollama pull llama3.1:8b
Python API via Together AI
from together import Together
client = Together()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct-Turbo",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Write a binary search in Rust."}],
max_tokens=512,
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)
Comparison to GPT-4
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 405B | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 88.6% | 88.7% |
| HumanEval | 89.0% | 90.2% |
| MATH | 73.8% | 76.6% |
| Context | 128k | 128k |
The gap is small. For teams that need data sovereignty, fine-tuning flexibility, or on-premises deployment, Llama 3.1 405B is a compelling GPT-4 alternative.
Summary
Llama 3.1 405B is the benchmark for what open-source models can achieve. Run quantized versions locally with Ollama, access full precision through inference providers, or fine-tune on your own data. Full model weights and instructions at HuggingFace.
Mahmudul Haque Qudrati
CEO & ML Engineer
Visionary leader with extensive experience in machine learning and software development. Drives strategic innovation and business growth.
More from Mahmudul
Related Articles
Open Code Review – An AI-powered code review CLI tool: A Practical Overview
Open Code Review is an open-source CLI tool from Alibaba that uses AI to review code changes. It runs locally, supports multiple LLMs, and costs about $0.01 per review. Here's a practical breakdown.
OpenCode vs Claude Code: Open-Source Agentic CLI Compared
OpenCode runs Claude, GPT, Gemini, or local Ollama models in one terminal agent — Claude Code is official, polished, and Anthropic-native. Honest 2026 comparison.
DeepSeek V4 Pro and Kimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Open Weights at Frontier Level
MIT vs Modified MIT licenses, AA Index 52-54 vs 61, H100 self-host break-even math, and when open weights beat closed APIs. June 2026 guide.
// discussion
Comments