Anthropic's Message Batches API provides a 50% discount on all Claude model pricing for requests that do not require an immediate response, with results delivered within 24 hours. It works the same way as OpenAI's Batch API: you submit a batch of requests, Anthropic processes them asynchronously, and you pay half price. Claude is particularly valuable for batch processing long documents and complex reasoning tasks where its instruction following and document comprehension capabilities genuinely pull ahead of cheaper alternatives.
Anthropic Message Batches API: 50% Off Claude for Async Workloads
Anthropic's Message Batches API gives you 50% off Claude pricing for requests that can wait up to 24 hours. Here is how to use it and which Claude workloads benefit most.
Mahmudul Haque Qudrati
CEO & ML Engineer
- When Claude Batch Processing Is Worth It
- How to Use the Anthropic Message Batches API
- Checking Status and Retrieving Results
- Pricing Calculation for Common Use Cases
- Batch Size and Rate Limits
- Choosing Between Claude Haiku and Sonnet for Batch Work
- Best Practices for Anthropic Batch API
- Common Pitfalls
- Keep Reading
One AI engineering post, weekly
LLM benchmarks, prompt techniques, and token-cost breakdowns — not another AI news roundup.
Claude's advantages over GPT-4o-mini are most pronounced on tasks requiring careful instruction following over long contexts and nuanced analysis. These are also the highest-value batch processing use cases.
Long document processing. Claude consistently performs better on tasks requiring careful reading of long documents (10,000-200,000 tokens). Legal document review, financial report summarization, academic paper analysis — these tasks see more quality improvement from using Claude over a cheaper model than short-text tasks do. The batch API makes Claude's superior long-context capability affordable at scale.
Complex reasoning with specific output formats. Claude models reliably follow complex output format specifications (nested JSON, structured reports with exact field requirements). For batch jobs where you need machine-parseable outputs, Claude's adherence to format instructions reduces post-processing failure rates.
Multi-step instruction chains. Tasks with 5+ instructions in a system prompt ("first extract X, then compare with Y, then classify as Z, then write a summary that...") are handled more reliably by Claude than smaller models. At batch API pricing, this capability is available at roughly the same cost per task as GPT-4o standard pricing.
How to Use the Anthropic Message Batches API
The API is available in the official Anthropic Python and TypeScript SDKs.
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
# Create a batch with multiple requests
batch = client.messages.batches.create(
requests=[
{
"custom_id": "doc-001",
"params": {
"model": "claude-3-5-haiku-20241022",
"max_tokens": 1024,
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Summarize the key financial metrics from this quarterly report: [document text]"
}
]
}
},
{
"custom_id": "doc-002",
"params": {
"model": "claude-3-5-haiku-20241022",
"max_tokens": 1024,
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Extract all named entities (people, organizations, locations) from: [document text]"
}
]
}
}
]
)
print(f"Batch created: {batch.id}")
print(f"Processing status: {batch.processing_status}")
Team workspace
Ship faster with chat, meetings, and projects in one place — Zlyqor.
Checking Status and Retrieving Results
import time
def wait_for_anthropic_batch(batch_id: str, poll_interval: int = 60):
while True:
batch = client.messages.batches.retrieve(batch_id)
print(f"Status: {batch.processing_status}")
print(f"Counts: {batch.request_counts}")
if batch.processing_status == "ended":
return batch
time.sleep(poll_interval)
completed = wait_for_anthropic_batch(batch.id)
# Stream results
for result in client.messages.batches.results(batch.id):
if result.result.type == "succeeded":
print(f"{result.custom_id}: {result.result.message.content[0].text}")
elif result.result.type == "errored":
print(f"{result.custom_id}: Error - {result.result.error}")
Pricing Calculation for Common Use Cases
Using Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic's most cost-efficient model) at batch pricing:
Standard Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.80/1M input tokens, $4.00/1M output tokens Batch Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.40/1M input tokens, $2.00/1M output tokens
Legal document review, 1,000 documents at 50K tokens each:
- Input tokens: 50M tokens
- Output tokens: 5M tokens (10% of input for summaries)
- Batch cost: (50M × $0.40/1M) + (5M × $2.00/1M) = $20 + $10 = $30
- Standard API cost would be $60
- Savings: $30 on this single batch job
Financial report summarization, 500 reports at 20K tokens each:
- Input tokens: 10M tokens
- Output tokens: 1M tokens
- Batch cost: (10M × $0.40/1M) + (1M × $2.00/1M) = $4 + $2 = $6
- Savings: $6 vs standard API
For teams processing millions of documents monthly, the savings compound significantly.
Batch Size and Rate Limits
Anthropic's Message Batches API currently supports:
- Up to 10,000 requests per batch
- Results available within 24 hours
- Results expire 29 days after creation — download before then
For larger workloads, create multiple sequential batches. If your workload is time-sensitive and you need results sooner than 24 hours, use the standard synchronous API.
Choosing Between Claude Haiku and Sonnet for Batch Work
The choice between Claude Haiku (cheap, fast, good for most tasks) and Claude Sonnet (expensive, better reasoning) should be driven by a task-specific eval, not assumptions.
As a starting point: use Haiku for classification, extraction, and summarization. Test Sonnet only for tasks where your eval shows Haiku is failing at an unacceptable rate. The batch price difference between Haiku and Sonnet is roughly 5x, which is significant at scale.
Best Practices for Anthropic Batch API
- Use custom IDs that map to your internal records. This makes result reconciliation straightforward.
- Monitor processing status via webhook or polling. Polling every 60 seconds is sufficient; the API has rate limits.
- Handle partial failures gracefully. Some requests may error; log them and retry individually.
- Combine with prompt caching for repeated system prompts to reduce input token costs further.
- Set appropriate max_tokens to avoid paying for unnecessary output tokens.
Common Pitfalls
- Assuming all requests succeed. Always implement error handling for individual results.
- Ignoring the 24-hour SLA. If your downstream depends on faster results, batch is not for you.
- Not testing with a small batch first. Validate your prompt and output format before scaling.
Keep Reading
- OpenAI Batch API Guide — The same approach for GPT models, for comparison.
- Prompt Caching: Anthropic and OpenAI Guide — Combine with batch API for further savings on repeated system prompts.
- Cutting LLM API Costs: The Complete Guide — The full framework for reducing LLM spend.
Pristren builds AI-powered software for teams. Zlyqor is our all-in-one workspace — chat, projects, time tracking, AI meeting summaries, and invoicing — in one tool. Try it free.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Anthropic Message Batches API?
Anthropic Message Batches API allows you to submit multiple requests to Claude models asynchronously at 50% off standard pricing. Results are delivered within 24 hours. It is ideal for workloads that do not require real-time responses, such as bulk document processing, data extraction, and offline analysis.
How does Anthropic Message Batches API work?
You create a batch with up to 10,000 requests, each with a unique custom_id and parameters (model, messages, max_tokens). Anthropic processes the batch asynchronously. You can poll for status or set up webhooks. Once completed, you retrieve results via the API. Each result includes the custom_id and either the model response or an error.
What are the best practices for Anthropic Message Batches API?
Best practices include: using descriptive custom_ids for easy reconciliation, monitoring batch status via polling or webhooks, handling partial failures with retry logic, combining with prompt caching to reduce costs, and testing with a small batch before scaling. Also, set realistic max_tokens to avoid wasted spend.
How much does Anthropic Message Batches API cost?
The batch API offers 50% off standard Claude pricing. For example, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.40/1M input tokens and $2.00/1M output tokens in batch mode, versus $0.80 and $4.00 standard. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $1.50/1M input and $7.50/1M output in batch mode. The exact savings depend on your usage volume.
Is Anthropic Message Batches API worth it in 2025?
Yes, for non-real-time workloads, the 50% discount makes Claude cost-competitive with cheaper models while maintaining superior quality on complex tasks. It is especially worth it for long document processing, structured data extraction, and multi-step reasoning tasks. Evaluate your specific use case with a small pilot to confirm quality meets your standards.
What is the maximum batch size for Anthropic Message Batches API?
Each batch can contain up to 10,000 requests. There is no limit on total tokens per batch, but each request must be within model limits. For larger workloads, you can create multiple sequential batches. Results are available for 29 days after creation.
Can I use Anthropic Message Batches API with Claude 3.5 Sonnet?
Yes, the batch API supports all Claude models, including Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. The 50% discount applies to all models. However, Sonnet is about 5x more expensive than Haiku in batch mode, so use it only when task quality requires it.

Mahmudul Haque Qudrati
CEO & ML Engineer
Visionary technologist, software engineer, and machine learning specialist. Founder and CEO of Pristren, directing engineering teams that ship production-grade AI/ML pipelines, mission-critical full-stack applications, and developer tooling. Creator of Zlyqor, the unified team workspace platform. Author of 540+ technical guides and benchmark research reports on large language models, agentic workflows, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and modern web stacks.
More from Mahmudul
Related Articles
What is GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance? A Practical Overview
Recent reports on GitHub suggest GPT-5.5 Codex's reasoning-token clustering causes degraded code quality. This post explains the mechanism, shows concrete examples, and offers practical mitigations.
Tokenomics: Quantifying Where Tokens Are Used in Agentic Software Engineering
Tokenomics quantifies token usage per step in agentic software engineering. This post breaks down the numbers, tradeoffs, and practical tips for cost optimization.
Why Does MCP Use So Many Tokens? (And How to Fix It)
MCP tool definitions can eat half your context window before you prompt. Here is why — and six fixes that actually work in Claude Code and Cursor.
// discussion
Comments