Qwen 2.5 72B: Alibaba's Multilingual Model That Rivals GPT-4o
Qwen 2.5 72B scores 9.12 on MT-Bench (vs GPT-4o at 9.18), supports 29 languages, and runs locally via Ollama. Here's how to get started.
Mahmudul Haque Qudrati
CEO & ML Engineer
One AI engineering post, weekly
LLM benchmarks, prompt techniques, and token-cost breakdowns — not another AI news roundup.
Qwen 2.5 72B from Alibaba Cloud's Qwen team is a 72-billion parameter model that scores within striking distance of GPT-4o on general benchmarks while adding deep multilingual support across 29 languages - including strong performance on Chinese, Arabic, and Japanese that Western-focused models often handle poorly.
MT-Bench: 9.12 (vs GPT-4o at 9.18). That's essentially tied on the most widely used instruction-following evaluation.
What's New in 2.5 vs 2.0
- 128k context (up from 32k in Qwen 2)
- Improved instruction following with fewer refusals on legitimate tasks
- Better structured output (JSON mode reliability)
- Enhanced long-document processing with reduced hallucination on citations
- Stronger coding capability (HumanEval 86.7%)
Team workspace
Ship faster with chat, meetings, and projects in one place — Zlyqor.
Running With Ollama
# Pull the 72B model (requires ~45GB VRAM or ~55GB system RAM with Metal)
ollama pull qwen2.5:72b
# Interactive chat
ollama run qwen2.5:72b
# Single prompt
ollama run qwen2.5:72b "Explain transformer attention in Japanese."
# Smaller variants for lower memory
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b # ~20GB VRAM
ollama pull qwen2.5:14b # ~9GB VRAM
ollama pull qwen2.5:7b # ~5GB VRAM
Python API (Via OpenAI-Compatible Endpoint)
from openai import OpenAI
# Using Together AI or another provider
client = OpenAI(
api_key="your-together-api-key",
base_url="https://api.together.xyz/v1"
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Turbo",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful multilingual assistant."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this document in both English and Arabic."}
],
temperature=0.7,
max_tokens=1024,
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)
Structured Output
Qwen 2.5 has improved JSON mode reliability for extraction tasks:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Turbo",
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": 'Extract: {"name": str, "date": str, "amount": float} from: "Invoice from Acme Corp dated March 15 for $1,250.00"'
}],
response_format={"type": "json_object"},
)
Language Coverage
Qwen 2.5 supports 29 languages with strong performance: English, Chinese (Simplified/Traditional), French, Spanish, German, Arabic, Japanese, Korean, Russian, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Polish, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai, Indonesian, and more.
Summary
Qwen 2.5 72B is the best open-source choice for multilingual applications, particularly those serving Asian and Middle Eastern markets where other open models underperform. Full model weights available at HuggingFace and detailed benchmarks at the Qwen blog.

Mahmudul Haque Qudrati
CEO & ML Engineer
Visionary technologist, software engineer, and machine learning specialist. Founder and CEO of Pristren, directing engineering teams that ship production-grade AI/ML pipelines, mission-critical full-stack applications, and developer tooling. Creator of Zlyqor, the unified team workspace platform. Author of 540+ technical guides and benchmark research reports on large language models, agentic workflows, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and modern web stacks.
More from Mahmudul
Related Articles
GPT-6 Astra Benchmarks, Pricing, and Safety: What Developers Need to Know
OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra delivers state-of-the-art coding and agentic performance, but costs 50% more than GPT-4o. This guide covers benchmarks, pricing, safety, and practical advice for developers deciding whether to upgrade.
Open Code Review – An AI-powered code review CLI tool: A Practical Overview
Open Code Review is an open-source CLI tool from Alibaba that uses AI to review code changes. It runs locally, supports multiple LLMs, and costs about $0.01 per review. Here's a practical breakdown.
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: June 2026 Benchmarks and Pricing
AA Index 61 vs 60 vs 57. SWE-Bench Pro, GDPval-AA, pricing tables, and where each model loses. Updated June 3, 2026 with primary source benchmarks.
// discussion
Comments